Lieberman derides NY Times for accusing PM of 'sabotaging diplomacy'

MK Avigdor Lieberman: Better to be attacked by The New York Times than to end up like Czechoslovakia in 1938, when swaths of the former state were granted to Nazi Germany for occupation • Editorial had accused Netanyahu of being "eager for a fight."

Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee Chairman MK Avigdor Lieberman compared an editorial by The New York Times critical of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's U.N. address this week to a headline published in September 1938 that praised the Munich Agreement for granting Adolf Hitler "less than his Sudeten demands."

 

"Today, The New York Times attacked Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for his speech [Tuesday], saying he was inciting to war and thwarting chances of peace with Iran," Lieberman wrote in a post to his Facebook page. "In 1938 the very same New York Times reported with excitement at the peace deal between Britain and Nazi Germany, over how Hitler got less than what he demanded. ... How did this 'peace deal' sit with the Nazi dictator -- we all know. So of course it is preferable to stand up for the State of Israel's crucial interests, and [it is preferable] for The New York Times to attack you than it is to end up like Czechoslovakia in 1938."

 

The Munich Agreement was a settlement that permitted Nazi Germany to annex parts of Czechoslovakia along the German border.

 

Lieberman attached a clipping of the 1938 headline, along with a picture of "historic European peace meeting," juxtaposed alongside the recent editorial about Netanyahu's speech.

 

The Times editorial -- published shortly after Netanyahu's speech at the U.N. General Assembly -- accused Netanyahu of "sabotaging diplomacy" and said the prime minister was "eager for a fight."

 

"Mr. Netanyahu has legitimate reasons to be wary of any Iranian overtures, as do the United States and the four other major powers involved in negotiations over Iran’s nuclear program," The Times' editorial board wrote. "But it could be disastrous if Mr. Netanyahu and his supporters in Congress were so blinded by distrust of Iran that they exaggerate the threat, block President Obama from taking advantage of new diplomatic openings and sabotage the best chance to establish a new relationship since the 1979 Iranian revolution sent American-Iranian relations into the deep freeze."

 

The paper wrote that even though Rouhani declared last week that Tehran had no intention of developing a nuclear weapon, "Iran hid its nuclear program from United Nations inspectors for nearly 20 years, and the country is enriching uranium to a level that would make it possible to produce bomb-grade nuclear material more quickly."

 

"These facts make it hard not to view the upcoming American-brokered negotiations skeptically," The Times admitted. "But Mr. Netanyahu has hinted so often of taking military action to keep Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon that he seems eager for a fight."

טעינו? נתקן! אם מצאתם טעות בכתבה, נשמח שתשתפו אותנו

כדאי להכיר